Death penalty abolition bill filed and waiting
It isn’t even January yet and already state legislators are “pre-filing” bills to be voted upon in the next session of the state legislature. As expected, first among them is a death penalty abolition bill with State Rep. Gary Holder-Winfield as its proponent. Holder-Winfield, you may recall, spearheaded the first abolition bill two years ago, which passed both the House and Senate and was ultimately vetoed by “only a month left until she’s gone, wooohoo” Gov. Rell.
Holder-Winfield has also introduced other necessary criminal justice reform legislation, like adopting the best practices for eyewitness identification procedures and videotaping interrogations. He has “pre-filed” a bill addressing the former once again.
Of course, with the just concluded Hayes trial and the upcoming circus in the trial of his co-defendant Joshua Komisarjevsky, the debate on the death penalty bill is likely to be emotional, contentious and close. But no one can accuse Holder-Winfield of falling prey to the typical abolitionist tendencies of avoiding confrontation and “waiting for the right moment”, which almost never materializes, because there’s always a heinous crime around which the pro-death penalty folks will rally.
With newly elected anti-death penalty Dan Malloy taking over the reins of the State for the next 4 years, there’s a sliver of hope for abolition.
H/T: CTNJ
| Print article | This entry was posted by Gideon on December 16, 2010 at 8:25 am, and is filed under cheshire, death penalty, eyewitness id, proposed legislation. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |


about 1 year ago
I miss this about the northeast. If someone told me this was happening in Georgia, I’d have to make sure “gullible” wasn’t written on the ceiling.
about 1 year ago
Now that Malloy has taken the co-chairs from us, the chances of abolition passing out of Judiciary are slimmer.
Sigh.
about 1 year ago
Yeah, I’m actually a little surprised that both of them decided to leave. I wonder who’ll take over.
about 1 year ago
I maintain that only one of them’s a loss.
about 1 year ago
Why can’t it happen? Both co-chairs admit Holder-Winfield did the work and the rumor is that he gets a position on the committee. He did the background work and brought out the bill so what’s the issue?