Dealing with Padilla v. Kentucky
SCOTUS’ decision in Padilla v. Kentucky has generated a lot of discussion and rightly so. As I noted in one post, some are concerned about the additional burden being placed on defense lawyers to learn and be informed of the highly complex area of immigration law.
Never fear. Here’s a practice advisory on Padilla, and more importantly, on pages 7-8, a list of deportable offenses and tips on how to approach a case with immigration consequences.
The advisory also points to several great resources on immigration consequences in criminal courts.
You can thank me later.
| Print article | This entry was posted by Gideon on April 9, 2010 at 7:28 am, and is filed under habeas, immigration, supreme court. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |


about 1 year ago
The practice advisory that you have provided on this website regarding immigration consequences in criminal defense work is great. It is very well done and extremely informative. Thank you for providing this work as well as the explanation of Padilla v. Kentucky. You have done defense attorneys a great service with this info.
David Bonilla