<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Bysiewicz eyeing the Gov&#8217;s race again?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://apublicdefender.com/2010/01/21/is-bysiewicz-eyeing-the-govs-race-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2010/01/21/is-bysiewicz-eyeing-the-govs-race-again/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 01:43:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gideon</title>
		<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2010/01/21/is-bysiewicz-eyeing-the-govs-race-again/comment-page-1/#comment-53368</link>
		<dc:creator>Gideon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apublicdefender.com/?p=2750#comment-53368</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s hilarious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s hilarious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kane</title>
		<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2010/01/21/is-bysiewicz-eyeing-the-govs-race-again/comment-page-1/#comment-53356</link>
		<dc:creator>Kane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apublicdefender.com/?p=2750#comment-53356</guid>
		<description>Notice how she put her own handwriting across the letter &quot;Richard.&quot;  Why not just say Dear &quot;Biased Friend of Mine . . .&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notice how she put her own handwriting across the letter &#8220;Richard.&#8221;  Why not just say Dear &#8220;Biased Friend of Mine . . .&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Thompson</title>
		<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2010/01/21/is-bysiewicz-eyeing-the-govs-race-again/comment-page-1/#comment-53355</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apublicdefender.com/?p=2750#comment-53355</guid>
		<description>Could someone provide a phonetic spelling of this candidate&#039;s name?  I even tried pronouncing it with mush in my mouth, but I don&#039;t think it&#039;s helping much...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could someone provide a phonetic spelling of this candidate&#8217;s name?  I even tried pronouncing it with mush in my mouth, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s helping much&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gideon</title>
		<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2010/01/21/is-bysiewicz-eyeing-the-govs-race-again/comment-page-1/#comment-53314</link>
		<dc:creator>Gideon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 03:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apublicdefender.com/?p=2750#comment-53314</guid>
		<description>The statute was enacted in 1897 apparently. So at some point someone thought that should be a requirement.

His opinion will be interesting, to say the least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The statute was enacted in 1897 apparently. So at some point someone thought that should be a requirement.</p>
<p>His opinion will be interesting, to say the least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2010/01/21/is-bysiewicz-eyeing-the-govs-race-again/comment-page-1/#comment-53312</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 03:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apublicdefender.com/?p=2750#comment-53312</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not just the amendments or the definition of the AG as a &quot;constitutional officer&quot; -- the unamended constitution read that:

&lt;blockquote&gt;SEC. 10. Every elector shall be eligible to any office in the state, except in cases provided for in this constitution.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So it would have spoken to even those elected positions not defined in the Constitution itself, such as AG prior to 1970.

I think she asked not because she&#039;s contemplating running for Governor, but because she expects Blumenthal not to even reach the &quot;active practice&quot; question in his response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not just the amendments or the definition of the AG as a &#8220;constitutional officer&#8221; &#8212; the unamended constitution read that:</p>
<blockquote><p>SEC. 10. Every elector shall be eligible to any office in the state, except in cases provided for in this constitution.</p></blockquote>
<p>So it would have spoken to even those elected positions not defined in the Constitution itself, such as AG prior to 1970.</p>
<p>I think she asked not because she&#8217;s contemplating running for Governor, but because she expects Blumenthal not to even reach the &#8220;active practice&#8221; question in his response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sujal</title>
		<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2010/01/21/is-bysiewicz-eyeing-the-govs-race-again/comment-page-1/#comment-53311</link>
		<dc:creator>sujal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 03:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apublicdefender.com/?p=2750#comment-53311</guid>
		<description>Yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: apublicdefender.com @ 2012-05-26 11:11:10 -->
