The absurd hero
Comparisons have been drawn, in recent days, between our condition and that of Milton’s Satan and Abdiel. Meaning has been sought to explain who we are and what makes us do what we do.
It is a curious profession we have chosen; those of us who dedicate our lives to defending the freedom of others. Certainly not I, nor most people I know, sought admittance into this small group with any notions of fame, grandeur and constant success. To the contrary, we were, and are only too aware that most battles we fight will be lost. Yet we carry on, day after day, year after year, pushing the rock up the hill.
To be sure, there are victories – some small and some big – yet the nature of the beast, the fabric of the system is such that we may be able to poke small holes in it only to soon become enveloped in it.
Even though we are not ourselves the object of the fire that spews from this beast’s nostrils, we deliberately place ourselves in that path. To get to my client, this other human being, you have to go through me. A small rebel force for hire, as it were.
But the damage we suffer, the blows we take, are small in comparison to the eventual destruction that is wreaked upon the life of the client. We dust ourselves off, sometimes taking longer than usual, and move on to the next person in need.
It is a sort of self-flagellation, I suppose.
I’ve never really thought about why I chose to subject myself to this. It seemed like a question that did not merit a response. I understand why the function is important: as the Emperor Julian is alleged to have said “if it suffices to accuse, what will become of the innocent?” To put in layman’s terms, the slippery-slope; there but for the grace of God…
But we do not exclusively represent the innocent; hardly ever, in fact. And yet even when a man we suspect to be guilty of the crime is he accused of committing is found to be so by a jury of his peers, the reaction is not of resignation or acceptance or that justice was done. There is always, unhesitatingly, a sense of defeat, failure and loss.
Maybe there’s nothing so profound about it all. Maybe we are just driven by our distrust of the Government and our desire to see that its laws are upheld in a consistent and orderly manner.
Are we Miltonian heroes? I’m not smart enough to answer that question. What I do know is that I have a job to do. A job that I know will most often end in failure and that the task is futile and yet I do it, day after day, year after year, decade after decade.
In that sense, I am Sisyphus. I must be happy.
| Print article | This entry was posted by Gideon on December 31, 2009 at 11:49 am, and is filed under psa. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |


about 2 years ago
Unlike Sisyphus, you have chosen your fate. For that you are admired.
about 2 years ago
In a manner of speaking, I suppose. Although you could make an argument that Sisyphus chose his fate (in general terms) as well and that I have not chosen anything, but it has chosen me.
It’s quite the conundrum: the struggle between the ever curious side of me and the comfortably existentialist one.
But that’s more than you ever wanted to know.
about 2 years ago
Hi Gideon,
I assume it’s evident that I have to leave a comment
You must not be happy. According to Camus you have to imagine (!) that you’re happy.
Greetings, A Happy New Year to you.
Joachim
about 2 years ago
Actually, it’s we who must imagine him happy. He’s too stressed out with the damned rock to notice.
May 2010 give more than your share of what passes for success in this business – and in life.
Gideon for Governor!
about 2 years ago
Haha. Thank you Jeff, for your valuable contribution to the ‘sphere. A wonderful addition indeed.
And the commenting here doesn’t hurt either
about 2 years ago
Although in a sense it would be more appropriate to characterize us as being Kafka-esque anti-heroes, rather than the absurd hero of Camus. There is a bit of hope in all of us, as was in Kafka’s characters.
about 2 years ago
That’s exactly what this reminded me of and I made that comment on Scott’s blog before I read this. But you are exactly right and first up the hill, besides!
about 2 years ago
and the first one down, then…
about 2 years ago
When you are feeling that what we do, regardless of the guilt of our clients, is not important — take a look at some other countries. I finally got to see Slumdog Millionaire (last year’s Best Picture) and was coincidentally reading Suketu Mehta’s Maxium City about modern Bombay/Mumbai and was struck by both descriptions of local policing.
Our clients, at least, are not physically tortured, nor assassinated, as a matter of routine police practice. We fight about forensics, eyewitness ID, false confession, and due process, but these disputes are, apparenly, luxuries in some parts of the world.
So yes, we’re much like the pre-2004 Red Sox fan — doomed to an endless cycle of hope and virtual certain disappointment, but there is nobility in the quest nonetheless.