<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monday Morning Jumpstart</title>
	<atom:link href="http://apublicdefender.com/2009/11/23/monday-morning-jumpstart-40/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2009/11/23/monday-morning-jumpstart-40/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 01:43:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gideon</title>
		<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2009/11/23/monday-morning-jumpstart-40/comment-page-1/#comment-52176</link>
		<dc:creator>Gideon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apublicdefender.com/?p=2486#comment-52176</guid>
		<description>Well, the question usually isn&#039;t why do they need zealous defense? It usually is: how can you defend those people?

The answer to that question, in my opinion, isn&#039;t that difficult to imagine or comprehend at all.

I mean, all one needs to do is put him/herself in the place of the person accused. 

That&#039;s my irritation with this question. Take a second; think about it. The answer will be apparent.

Or maybe I&#039;m viewing this through a tinted lens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the question usually isn&#8217;t why do they need zealous defense? It usually is: how can you defend those people?</p>
<p>The answer to that question, in my opinion, isn&#8217;t that difficult to imagine or comprehend at all.</p>
<p>I mean, all one needs to do is put him/herself in the place of the person accused. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s my irritation with this question. Take a second; think about it. The answer will be apparent.</p>
<p>Or maybe I&#8217;m viewing this through a tinted lens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gerardw</title>
		<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2009/11/23/monday-morning-jumpstart-40/comment-page-1/#comment-52175</link>
		<dc:creator>gerardw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apublicdefender.com/?p=2486#comment-52175</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.simplejustice.us/2009/11/22/a-blog-that-shouldnt.aspx#comment-2583344&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;If anyone with half a brain took a second to think about it...&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

I think for the non-lawyers you need to have read a few hundred news stories about folks in jail being released after found innocent or the Boston FBI guys who were indicted to realize the accused need a forceful advocate against the real and perceived power of the state.

Seems like when police officers are judged by arrests and prosecutors judged by convictions, niceties such as whether the conviction was justified tend to get overlooked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.simplejustice.us/2009/11/22/a-blog-that-shouldnt.aspx#comment-2583344" rel="nofollow"><i>If anyone with half a brain took a second to think about it&#8230;</i></a></p>
<p>I think for the non-lawyers you need to have read a few hundred news stories about folks in jail being released after found innocent or the Boston FBI guys who were indicted to realize the accused need a forceful advocate against the real and perceived power of the state.</p>
<p>Seems like when police officers are judged by arrests and prosecutors judged by convictions, niceties such as whether the conviction was justified tend to get overlooked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: apublicdefender.com @ 2012-05-26 07:24:58 -->
