Life on the inside: an inmate’s view
For two months now, the Ann Arbor chronicle has been publishing the Washtenaw Jail Diary, a series of chapters by a former inmate at that jail, chronicling his life behind bars and his experiences. Interestingly, the content of the chapters were originally published as tweets, but later taken down and deleted. This unnamed inmate is now in the process of writing a book, it seems, while at the same time publishing these stories in the newspaper. They’re up to the third chapter and you can find all the installments here.
The latest installment, Chapter 3, is of particular interest to me, because in it he writes about “The Public Pretender”:
I still cannot decide if I had decent representation within the parameters of the “McJustice” doled out via the overworked Public Defender’s office and the backroom horse trading that goes on. If I could have afforded a real lawyer, one with “connections,” would I have done as much jail time? I do not know the answer to that. I tend to think that I would have gone free sooner. But I will never know for sure.
I am taken from my block and brought to a room back near the dreaded holding tanks, meeting with the person with whom I am to entrust my life. And here, in front of me, is Clarence fucking Darrow, himself – all bluster and a bit cartoonish, reveling, it seems to me, in being the center of attention. He is surrounded by assistants, interns, law students – almost all of whom, I am strangely curious to discover, are attractive young women.
…
The Pretender tells me that I am not the usual kind of person he represents, since I am apparently well-spoken and educated. But that does not prevent him from launching into street lingo, some of which I ask him to translate for me. He speaks this way out of habit, I am guessing, to try to win the trust of his usual crop of clients.
I have mixed feelings about my Pretender. Do I want what appears to me to be a snake oil salesman representing my interests in these felony cases? Maybe this is exactly the kind of person I need on my side. The lawyer in my misdemeanor cases seemed much too timid for me – in fact, agreeing with the prosecutor in court.
But there’s more. For instance, this handy guide to writing a successful “speech to the judge”:
Major ingredients for a successful speech to a judge include:
1. Apologize to the court, to the community and to any victims harmed and admit your mistakes.
2. Talk about what you are doing while in jail to further your education, help the jail community or help control destructive behavior (AA, Alternatives to Domestic Abuse, GED, etc.).
3. Discuss your job possibilities after you return to the community and the support system of family and friends that awaits you.
4. Mention family members, teachers, members of the community who might have written letters to the judge on your behalf.Do not:
1. Insist you are innocent.
2. Tell a hard-luck story about yourself and your family.
3. Fail to address the court clearly and with respect.
| Print article | This entry was posted by Gideon on November 15, 2009 at 4:03 pm, and is filed under inmate issues. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |
about 2 years ago
Rats! I was waiting for you to comment on his comments about public defenders.
In my own experience — and, btw, I am a private attorney — I originally would always tell potential clients that I was not going to badmouth public defenders. I pointed out to them that there are good public defenders and bad ones, which, I said, is exactly the same when it comes to private attorneys. It is unfortunately not true that “you get what you pay for.” Perhaps a fee is a partial indicator: a fee that significantly undercuts quotes someone might have received from other attorneys is probably a red flag. But you can still get a “free” public defender who does a better job than a lot of private attorneys you could hire.
In fact, all other things being equal (which, sadly, they are not), I would expect public defenders to be better attorneys, on average, than private attorneys. Among other reasons, they get more experience and are more often “tried by fire” than private attorneys. Plus, they’re usually part of the largest defense firm in town, giving them access to even more experience.
Now, above, I said, “originally” I would not badmouth public defenders. In a sense, I still won’t. But in my part of the world, it has become even more difficult to obtain good representation from a public defender. This is not the fault of the public defenders who remain after budget cuts. It is because California has apparently decided that indigent criminal defense is not remotely as important as arresting and prosecuting people. (It’s never been as important: but now it’s not even close.) Staff levels — lawyers AND support staff such as investigators — are so low and client loads are so high that I doubt even the best of public defenders does as good a job as most of their clients need.
Last year, when the Fresno County District Attorney’s Office blamed the high acquittal rate on “not enough money,” rather than overcharging and overzealous prosecution with inadequate investigation, they were apparently heard. Sort of.
They didn’t get more money. But public defenders, who handle the majority of clients in this county, got less.
about 2 years ago
Your comment is far too long for me to respond to without giving it due thought. I’ll get to it soon enough.
about 2 years ago
So I read the full series … quite, quite depressing. And folks are supposed to come out rehabiliated?
about 2 years ago
No, they are not. They’re supposed to come out shamed, scared and with no prospects for the future. It’s all “life on the installment plan”.