<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Liveblogging Raising The Bar: Season 2, Episode 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://apublicdefender.com/2009/06/22/liveblogging-raising-the-bar-season-2-episode-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2009/06/22/liveblogging-raising-the-bar-season-2-episode-3/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 06:06:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windypundit</title>
		<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2009/06/22/liveblogging-raising-the-bar-season-2-episode-3/comment-page-1/#comment-49924</link>
		<dc:creator>Windypundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apublicdefender.com/?p=2371#comment-49924</guid>
		<description>Oh, sorry. That was in ep 2, which I guess you missed.  Michelle and Jerry agree to a future court date, but when they show up in court, Farnsworth announces his rule that &quot;There shall be no consent adjournment without prior approval by this court.&quot;

Michelle: Your honor, we&#039;re not prepared to start trial this morning.

Farnsworth: You&#039;re on the calendar.

Michelle: I haven&#039;t notified my witnesses.

Farnsworth: That was probably a mistake.

Jerry: Yeah, we didn&#039;t know about your rules, Judge.

Farnsworth has a little more to say, but he sets a trial date.  Jerry probably wasn&#039;t going to get an immediate acquittal anyway, so I guess maybe he wanted to stay on good terms with Michelle, but it just seemed odd that he didn&#039;t try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, sorry. That was in ep 2, which I guess you missed.  Michelle and Jerry agree to a future court date, but when they show up in court, Farnsworth announces his rule that &#8220;There shall be no consent adjournment without prior approval by this court.&#8221;</p>
<p>Michelle: Your honor, we&#8217;re not prepared to start trial this morning.</p>
<p>Farnsworth: You&#8217;re on the calendar.</p>
<p>Michelle: I haven&#8217;t notified my witnesses.</p>
<p>Farnsworth: That was probably a mistake.</p>
<p>Jerry: Yeah, we didn&#8217;t know about your rules, Judge.</p>
<p>Farnsworth has a little more to say, but he sets a trial date.  Jerry probably wasn&#8217;t going to get an immediate acquittal anyway, so I guess maybe he wanted to stay on good terms with Michelle, but it just seemed odd that he didn&#8217;t try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gideon</title>
		<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2009/06/22/liveblogging-raising-the-bar-season-2-episode-3/comment-page-1/#comment-49917</link>
		<dc:creator>Gideon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apublicdefender.com/?p=2371#comment-49917</guid>
		<description>Which episode are you referring to? Ideally, if the prosecutor wasn&#039;t ready and the judge was pushing him/her to start, I&#039;d sit back and watch and then when the State had nothing, I&#039;d move for a judgment of acquittal based on the fact that they put on no evidence.

Maybe he wanted a favor in return?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which episode are you referring to? Ideally, if the prosecutor wasn&#8217;t ready and the judge was pushing him/her to start, I&#8217;d sit back and watch and then when the State had nothing, I&#8217;d move for a judgment of acquittal based on the fact that they put on no evidence.</p>
<p>Maybe he wanted a favor in return?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windypundit</title>
		<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2009/06/22/liveblogging-raising-the-bar-season-2-episode-3/comment-page-1/#comment-49910</link>
		<dc:creator>Windypundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apublicdefender.com/?p=2371#comment-49910</guid>
		<description>Alright, I&#039;m way behind and just catching up on Tivo.  All I know about trials is what I learned reading courtroom dramas, but can somebody tell me, when the judge wanted to start the trial and the prosecutor said she wasn&#039;t ready, why did Jerry try to help her out?  Shouldn&#039;t he have pushed for a dismissal or something?  Or maybe just stood up and announced he was ready for trial immediately?  She didn&#039;t have her witnesses in court. How could he lose?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright, I&#8217;m way behind and just catching up on Tivo.  All I know about trials is what I learned reading courtroom dramas, but can somebody tell me, when the judge wanted to start the trial and the prosecutor said she wasn&#8217;t ready, why did Jerry try to help her out?  Shouldn&#8217;t he have pushed for a dismissal or something?  Or maybe just stood up and announced he was ready for trial immediately?  She didn&#8217;t have her witnesses in court. How could he lose?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 1.128 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-01-16 15:57:48 -->

