Lege ponders bill to ignore Fed’l Constitution
Alternate title: CT legislature considers bill seceding from these United States of America.
State Republican Senator Dan Debicella apparently hasn’t heard of the Federal constitution, or doesn’t care that it exists. That can be the only logical explanation for his sponsorship of this bill, which effectively overrules Kennedy v. Louisiana.
The proposed bill would make a sexual assault, under section 53a-70, 53a-70a or 53a-71 of the general statutes, of a child under thirteen years punishable by death.
Now, for those of you with extremely short memories *cough*Debicella*cough*, Kennedy held that:
“[t]he Eighth Amendment bars Louisiana from imposing the death penalty for the rape of a child where the crime did not result, and was not intended to result, in the victim’s death.
According to the Court, “[t]he death penalty is not a proportional punishment for the rape of a child.” The opinion, which was joined by the court’s four more liberal judges, went on to state, “The court concludes that there is a distinction between intentional first-degree murder, on the one hand, and non-homicide crimes against individuals, even including child rape, on the other. The latter crimes may be devastating in their harm, as here, but in terms of moral depravity and of the injury to the person and to the public, they cannot compare to murder in their severity and irrevocability.” The opinion concluded that in cases of crimes against individuals, “the death penalty should not be expanded to instances where the victim’s life was not taken.”
Now that seems pretty cut and dry, unless of course, there is some argument that the Federal Constitution applies to Louisiana but not Connecticut, because Connecticut was never a part of the United States due to some error back in the day and hence is its own duchy.
Either that, or Debicella got some bad advice. Thankfully, the rest of the legislators in the judiciary committee seem to have heard of Kennedy, since there’s been no action on the bill since it’s proposal in January.
For more on Kennedy, see Sex Crimes’ resource page.
| Print article | This entry was posted by Gideon on March 30, 2009 at 7:11 pm, and is filed under ct legal news, death penalty, dumb laws, proposed legislation, sex offenders. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |



about 1 year ago
Well, since the Supreme Court ignored the Constitution in Kennedy, it’s not like anyone can complain when people ignore what the Supreme Court says.
about 1 year ago
Right, because the Constitution specifically permits the death penalty for rape of child which does not result in death.
Weak.
about 1 year ago
That’s not the issue, Gid. The Fourteeth Amendment acts as a limitation on the power of states. There’s simply no such limitation in the constitution. The Supreme Court made it up.
They should be ignored.
about 1 year ago
So States should be free to ignore SCOTUS decisions they don’t agree with? Okay…
about 1 year ago
Actually, I believe so. Otherwise, the only “law” which has teeth is that the Supreme Court’s opinions are to be followed. Where the Supreme Court blatantly blows off the law, as it did in Kennedy, it cannot complain when others follow its example.
about 1 year ago
A proposed bill is the lowest form of anything that goes on at the legislature. Proposed bills happen at the very beginning of a session and are often insane. Committees review proposed bills and then decide whether or not to do anything (i.e. a public hearing) or just let the idea die.
None of this changes the fact that proposing this bill requires one to embrace one’s own ignorance.
about 1 year ago
Of course, Ryan, you do realize that “contemporaneous standards” can be revised against criminals, and this is the only way to get those on record.