<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We don&#8217;t need no! Sentencing Guidelines!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://apublicdefender.com/2008/11/18/we-dont-need-no-sentencing-guidelines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2008/11/18/we-dont-need-no-sentencing-guidelines/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:46:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greg Jones</title>
		<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2008/11/18/we-dont-need-no-sentencing-guidelines/comment-page-1/#comment-43539</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apublicdefender.com/?p=1792#comment-43539</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve practiced with no sentencing guidelines, with advisory guidelines, and with mandatory guidelines.  Basically, I don&#039;t like any guidelines, but advisory guidelines are the worst possible choice.  In practice, they set a floor on the minimum in an indeterminate sentencing system, like that in Michigan, or a floor on the determinate sentence.  Judges and prosecutors never go below the guidelines, because &quot;the guidelines call for X.&quot;  But tough-on-crime judges will happily go above the guidlines, believing that the guidelines do not accurately capture the seriousness of a particular offense, or truly measure the horrendous nature of the defendant&#039;s past criminal record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve practiced with no sentencing guidelines, with advisory guidelines, and with mandatory guidelines.  Basically, I don&#8217;t like any guidelines, but advisory guidelines are the worst possible choice.  In practice, they set a floor on the minimum in an indeterminate sentencing system, like that in Michigan, or a floor on the determinate sentence.  Judges and prosecutors never go below the guidelines, because &#8220;the guidelines call for X.&#8221;  But tough-on-crime judges will happily go above the guidlines, believing that the guidelines do not accurately capture the seriousness of a particular offense, or truly measure the horrendous nature of the defendant&#8217;s past criminal record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gideon</title>
		<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2008/11/18/we-dont-need-no-sentencing-guidelines/comment-page-1/#comment-43533</link>
		<dc:creator>Gideon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apublicdefender.com/?p=1792#comment-43533</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a good idea. It doesn&#039;t cover all the variables, but gives prosecutors and defense attorneys a starting point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good idea. It doesn&#8217;t cover all the variables, but gives prosecutors and defense attorneys a starting point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LJS</title>
		<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2008/11/18/we-dont-need-no-sentencing-guidelines/comment-page-1/#comment-43531</link>
		<dc:creator>LJS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apublicdefender.com/?p=1792#comment-43531</guid>
		<description>What about a public, easily searchable, database of sentences by offense, judge, and court, and docket number? As I recall, there are books listing money verdicts and settlements for almost any tort injury you can name -- why not compile the same for criminal verdicts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about a public, easily searchable, database of sentences by offense, judge, and court, and docket number? As I recall, there are books listing money verdicts and settlements for almost any tort injury you can name &#8212; why not compile the same for criminal verdicts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gideon</title>
		<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2008/11/18/we-dont-need-no-sentencing-guidelines/comment-page-1/#comment-43524</link>
		<dc:creator>Gideon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apublicdefender.com/?p=1792#comment-43524</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s saying &quot;Scott&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s saying &#8220;Scott&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shg</title>
		<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2008/11/18/we-dont-need-no-sentencing-guidelines/comment-page-1/#comment-43523</link>
		<dc:creator>shg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apublicdefender.com/?p=1792#comment-43523</guid>
		<description>Cool pic.  But what&#039;s that coming out of his mouth?  It&#039;s a little small, and I&#039;m having some trouble reading it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool pic.  But what&#8217;s that coming out of his mouth?  It&#8217;s a little small, and I&#8217;m having some trouble reading it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charon QC</title>
		<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2008/11/18/we-dont-need-no-sentencing-guidelines/comment-page-1/#comment-43505</link>
		<dc:creator>Charon QC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apublicdefender.com/?p=1792#comment-43505</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a criminal lawyer - but, curiously, having enjoyed the subject at University I have kept up my knowledge of the Criminal Law of England &amp; Wales.

Inconsistency is a very real problem - enjoyed the post.

We appear, in England &amp; Wales, to be slowly sinking into a mire of inconsistency - quite apart from the fact that we don&#039;t have enough prisons to appease the tabloid readers as they eat their breakfasts and get outraged when judges are lenient.

It may be that I need more sleep.

(Ed Note: Scotland, although an allegedly reluctant part of Britain, has a different legal system.  Although I am a Scot - I chose the England &amp; Wales route.  You will note how careful I am to refer to England &amp; Wales.  The Welsh get very irritated when we forget that they are part of our legal system in England &amp; Wales.

I&#039;m not sure that this post adds anything at all to the discussion - but such is the pleasure of being a blogger.  The  blog host can always delete!

It is 6.38 am.  I went to bed at 3.56 am.  I&#039;m not entirely sure that posting on blogs after a good night is one olf my better ideas - but ... there we are.... such is the pleasure of being a law blogger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a criminal lawyer &#8211; but, curiously, having enjoyed the subject at University I have kept up my knowledge of the Criminal Law of England &amp; Wales.</p>
<p>Inconsistency is a very real problem &#8211; enjoyed the post.</p>
<p>We appear, in England &amp; Wales, to be slowly sinking into a mire of inconsistency &#8211; quite apart from the fact that we don&#8217;t have enough prisons to appease the tabloid readers as they eat their breakfasts and get outraged when judges are lenient.</p>
<p>It may be that I need more sleep.</p>
<p>(Ed Note: Scotland, although an allegedly reluctant part of Britain, has a different legal system.  Although I am a Scot &#8211; I chose the England &amp; Wales route.  You will note how careful I am to refer to England &amp; Wales.  The Welsh get very irritated when we forget that they are part of our legal system in England &amp; Wales.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure that this post adds anything at all to the discussion &#8211; but such is the pleasure of being a blogger.  The  blog host can always delete!</p>
<p>It is 6.38 am.  I went to bed at 3.56 am.  I&#8217;m not entirely sure that posting on blogs after a good night is one olf my better ideas &#8211; but &#8230; there we are&#8230;. such is the pleasure of being a law blogger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.441 seconds -->
