a public defender


Tried together, but separately

Posted on November 11, 2008 by Gideon

Someone needs to explain to me how this works. Three co-defendants in a cop-killing trial in NYC are tried together, but each has their own jury. Short, thin and fat are being tried in front of green, blue and yellow. And this is considered efficient?

Related Posts with Thumbnails

RSS feed | Trackback URI

1 Comment »

Comment by shg

I realize how bizarre it must seem, but oddly enough it works fairly well. It usually comes about because of Bruton problems, so when the problem statement is about to come out, the march the other two juries out of the room and the witness testifies. Then they march them back in.

The alternative is three separate trials, which is obviously a greater use of resources, though it puts the witness through cross each time as well with the next guy enjoying whatever changes happen from trial to trial.

 
Attention: Before you comment, please read the disclaimer/privacy policy and the comment policy. By commenting here, you agree to abide by the terms and conditions of this blog and you take full responsibility for your comments and any consequences thereof.

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Subscribe to comments via email
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post