| Print article | This entry was posted by Gideon on September 29, 2008 at 6:54 pm, and is filed under tv shows. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |
search the blog
Loadingrecent comments
- A Voice of Sanity on CT death penalty nothing but arbitrary
- A Voice of Sanity on The engine that just didn’t give a f*ck
- A Voice of Sanity on The uselessness of crossing an eyewitness
- Free-ish on Mi case es su case
- DOJ finds widespread racial profiling in East Haven on Sundown comes to East Haven
- Bay Area Lawyer on Courthouse Steps Syndrome
- Helping jurors ‘see’ what eye witnesses said they saw « The Jury Room on Witnessing bullshit
- Rita Handrich on Witnessing bullshit
- LJS on Witnessing bullshit
- Gideon on Witnessing bullshit
terms of use
Nothing on this blog is legal advice.
Read the Legal Disclaimer and Privacy Policy.
For the full comments policy, click here.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial Share Alike 3.0 License.
-
-
Categories
- "Baker" claims
- abortion
- Adam Walsh Act
- aro
- asides
- bail
- Books
- campaign
- cheshire
- clients
- confessions
- cops
- criminal law principles
- crumbs
- ct legal news
- ct state law
- Current Affairs
- david pollitt
- death penalty
- dna
- double jeopardy
- drug offenses
- dui
- dumb laws
- ethics
- euthanasia/pas
- events
- evidence
- eyewitness id
- federal criminal issues
- fifth amendment
- first amendment
- fourth amendment
- georgia
- guns
- habeas
- immigration
- inmate issues
- innocence
- internet privacy
- judges
- julie amero
- jumpstart
- juries
- juveniles
- kerrigan
- lawyers as people
- link dump
- mental health
- michael ross
- moi
- open thread
- pd system
- pd victories
- prison overcrowding
- proposed legislation
- prosecutors
- psa
- racial disparity
- rants
- residency restrictions
- rewind
- same-sex marriages
- sentencing
- sex offenders
- sixth amendment
- smart on crime
- snitching
- sunday stupidity
- supreme court
- technical
- this month
- tv shows
- Uncategorized
- US legal news
- videotaped interrogations
- we are real lawyers too
- Weblogs
- whaaaa?
- wrongful convictions
-
Tags
aclu attorney general cheshire connecticut cops criminal law principles ct legal news ct state law david pollitt death penalty dna evidence eyewitness identification fifth amendment fourth amendment habeas iac indigent defense inmate issues judge handy jumpstart moi new york pd system plea bargaining prison overcrowding procedural default proposed legislation psa racial profiling registration residency restrictions retroactive right to counsel SCOC self-defense sentencing sex offenders sixth amendment snitching state law susan bysiewicz tonya craft voir dire wrongful convictions

about 3 years ago
Well…..I’ve given this episode a B+
For me, that’s a REALLY high score for a TV show. There is clearly room for improvement…as always, but it’s good enough for me to recommend the show to others.
I’m still sorta stumped by the bi-sexual clerk getting soooooo internally frustrated by the Judge claiming that “some” gay behavior is learned. He seems to think it’s genetic….so where does that leave a bi-sexual person? Is there a bi-sexual gene too? I’m just confused by that whole storyline.
about 3 years ago
So, prisoners are sent to court in their regular clothes (most of the time), and the meeting may have been in the holding cell, which typically happens. But they cannot be sentenced the same day, as there must be a PSR prepared after conviction and before sentence.
And there has never been a female judge whose rulings invariably beg reversal, but who has enough juice to survive appeals with a remarkably low reversal rate. Hey David, who might that judge be?
about 3 years ago
I didn’t really have any issues with the same day sentencing. I’ve done that in cases where the client (out of custody) had no or nominal background and if I didn’t order the PSI ahead of time and lost the case, my client would risk bond being revoked, going into custody, and spending 30 days in custody waiting on a report to say…no priors,etc. an then getting probation. So I order the PSI in advance of trial and amend it instanter, if I loose the trial.