| Print article | This entry was posted by Gideon on September 29, 2008 at 6:54 pm, and is filed under tv shows. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |
search the blog
Loadingrecent comments
- Tulsa Divorce Attorneys on The ideal ideal
- Jeff Gamso on The ideal ideal
- John Kindley on The ideal ideal
- mirriam on The ideal ideal
- Jeff Gamso on The ideal ideal
- Vidocq on Where were you on April 17, 1966?
- John Kindley on The ideal ideal
- Gideon on Where were you on April 17, 1966?
- shg on Where were you on April 17, 1966?
- Tulsa Divorce Attorneys on The freakin’ FCC: obscenely indecent
posts of note
terms of use
Nothing on this blog is legal advice.
Read the Legal Disclaimer and Privacy Policy.
For the full comments policy, click here.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial Share Alike 3.0 License.
-
most commented posts
- Castle doctrine come home to roost 41 comment(s)
- Is the Attorney General statute unconstitutional? 40 comment(s)
- Justice 36 comment(s)
- If you like these things, you're a poseur 36 comment(s)
- The right to a jury trial: Can you afford it? 31 comment(s)
- 10 things I didn't learn in law school 30 comment(s)
- The maelstrom that is cover your ass-ery 30 comment(s)
- It's the client, my good chap 29 comment(s)
- Some days are agonizing 29 comment(s)
- Vengeance at its most shameful 28 comment(s)
popular posts this month
- Innocence on a clock 1 comment(s)
- Every day is Caturday 7 comment(s)
- Sex offenders on probation: setting them up to fail 22 comment(s)
- Where were you on April 17, 1966? 3 comment(s)
- Tonya Craft teaches us all 15 comment(s)
- Why people think criminal defense lawyers are scum (updated x2) 8 comment(s)
- The defendant's right to trial by jury 16 comment(s)
- Conviction: the movie 0 comment(s)
- Dealing with Padilla v. Kentucky 1 comment(s)
- Indigent defense on trial 0 comment(s)
-
Tags
aclu attorney general cheshire connecticut cops criminal law principles ct legal news ct state law david pollitt death penalty dna evidence ex post facto eyewitness identification fifth amendment fourth amendment habeas iac indigent defense inmate issues judge handy jumpstart moi new york pd system plea bargaining prison overcrowding procedural default proposed legislation psa registration residency restrictions retroactive right to counsel SCOC self-defense sentencing sex offenders sixth amendment snitching state law susan bysiewicz tonya craft voir dire wrongful convictions
Mystique theme by digitalnature | Powered by WordPress
RSS Feeds XHTML 1.1 Top
RSS Feeds XHTML 1.1 Top


about 1 year ago
Well…..I’ve given this episode a B+
For me, that’s a REALLY high score for a TV show. There is clearly room for improvement…as always, but it’s good enough for me to recommend the show to others.
I’m still sorta stumped by the bi-sexual clerk getting soooooo internally frustrated by the Judge claiming that “some” gay behavior is learned. He seems to think it’s genetic….so where does that leave a bi-sexual person? Is there a bi-sexual gene too? I’m just confused by that whole storyline.
about 1 year ago
So, prisoners are sent to court in their regular clothes (most of the time), and the meeting may have been in the holding cell, which typically happens. But they cannot be sentenced the same day, as there must be a PSR prepared after conviction and before sentence.
And there has never been a female judge whose rulings invariably beg reversal, but who has enough juice to survive appeals with a remarkably low reversal rate. Hey David, who might that judge be?
about 1 year ago
I didn’t really have any issues with the same day sentencing. I’ve done that in cases where the client (out of custody) had no or nominal background and if I didn’t order the PSI ahead of time and lost the case, my client would risk bond being revoked, going into custody, and spending 30 days in custody waiting on a report to say…no priors,etc. an then getting probation. So I order the PSI in advance of trial and amend it instanter, if I loose the trial.