a public defender


Gideon’s turning in his grave

Posted on September 03, 2008 by Gideon

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

From the very same state that gave us Gideon v. Wainwright comes the news that their public defender system is in dire straits.

A judge in Miami ruled today that the public defender system is so overburdened and crushed by caseload that they can stop accepting some cases until the situation improves.

Circuit Judge Stanford Blake found that Public Defender Bennett Brummer’s office has absorbed 12.6 percent in budget cuts over the last two years, while its criminal caseload has rocketed by 29 percent since 2004.

“The evidence shows that the number of active cases is so high that the assistant public defenders are, at best, providing minimal competent representation to the accused,” Blake wrote.

“While the court is concerned that there not be chaos in the criminal justice system, the court must also serve as the protector of due process and meaningful representation of the accused,” the judge added.

Starting mid-September, around 2000 cases a month will have to be shipped out to private counsel, because public defenders are unable to handle them.

The state (and state’s attorneys) of course hates being told what to do:

“This is a political matter that should have stayed in the political system,” Rundle said. “No one should create a constitutional crisis that jeopardizes the integrity of our criminal justice system.”

Maybe the funding of public defender systems is a political matter, but the representation of over 2000 defendants a month is certainly not. It is a legal and constitutional issue and every defendant should receive competent representation. If the political system that this prosecutor seems so fond of actually contributes to the situation that has resulted, then why should fixing this problem be left up to them? It’s like saying sentencing should be left up to defendants.

There was nowhere else for the public defenders to turn. The Court stepped in and did what it had to and what it should have.

Scoplaw, one of those hard-working public defenders in Miami, weighs in.

Sphere: Related Content

RSS feed | Trackback URI

2 Comments »

Comment by LJS
2008-09-04 14:28:23

What do you expect when one of the big applause lines in the Republican VP candidate’s speach last night was:

“Al Qaeda terrorists still plot to inflict catastrophic harm on
America … he’s worried that someone won’t read them their rights?”

http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/09/04/america/04palin-speech.php?
page=3

A convention hall full over movers and shakers applauded the denigration of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. That’s sad.

As to your topic, having been thru the appointed counsel strike in Mass — perhaps this will do some good in Fla.

 
Comment by Edintally Subscribed to comments via email
2008-09-05 22:04:04

But this has no effect on misdemeanor PDs, just A and B felony cases?

 
Attention: Before you comment, please read the disclaimer/privacy policy and the comment policy. By commenting here, you agree to abide by the terms and conditions of this blog and you take full responsibility for your comments and any consequences thereof.

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Subscribe to comments via email
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Readers who viewed this page, also viewed:

By submitting a comment here you grant this site a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. You have also read and agreed to the disclaimer, privacy policy and comment terms of use, linked to in the sidebar. Comments may be edited and deleted without notice at the will of the owner/author of this blog.

Trackback responses to this post