Comments on: QOTD http://apublicdefender.com/2008/06/18/qotd-2/ Wed, 25 Apr 2012 01:43:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: SPO http://apublicdefender.com/2008/06/18/qotd-2/comment-page-1/#comment-33787 SPO Sun, 22 Jun 2008 20:48:37 +0000 http://apublicdefender.com/?p=1268#comment-33787 I agree with the majority, but ever ever so slightly . . . . Scalia's dissent is very well done, and is definitely worth a read. Where I come out is that I don't think that the states are required to have a circus go on, see, e.g., Scott Panetti. I agree with the majority, but ever ever so slightly . . . . Scalia’s dissent is very well done, and is definitely worth a read.

Where I come out is that I don’t think that the states are required to have a circus go on, see, e.g., Scott Panetti.

]]> By: Gideon http://apublicdefender.com/2008/06/18/qotd-2/comment-page-1/#comment-33778 Gideon Sun, 22 Jun 2008 16:21:52 +0000 http://apublicdefender.com/?p=1268#comment-33778 Believe it or not, I haven't gotten around to reading it yet. It's been a busy week; I'll be posting about it later today. I take it you're a fan? Believe it or not, I haven’t gotten around to reading it yet. It’s been a busy week; I’ll be posting about it later today. I take it you’re a fan?

]]> By: SPO http://apublicdefender.com/2008/06/18/qotd-2/comment-page-1/#comment-33632 SPO Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:31:00 +0000 http://apublicdefender.com/?p=1268#comment-33632 Interested in your take on Scalia's dissent in Indiana v. Edwards. Interested in your take on Scalia’s dissent in Indiana v. Edwards.

]]>