QOTD
| Print article | This entry was posted by Gideon on June 18, 2008 at 9:05 pm, and is filed under psa. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |
| Print article | This entry was posted by Gideon on June 18, 2008 at 9:05 pm, and is filed under psa. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |
about 3 years ago
Interested in your take on Scalia’s dissent in Indiana v. Edwards.
about 3 years ago
Believe it or not, I haven’t gotten around to reading it yet. It’s been a busy week; I’ll be posting about it later today. I take it you’re a fan?
about 3 years ago
I agree with the majority, but ever ever so slightly . . . . Scalia’s dissent is very well done, and is definitely worth a read.
Where I come out is that I don’t think that the states are required to have a circus go on, see, e.g., Scott Panetti.