a public defender


Judge for a Day III

Posted on June 07, 2008 by Gideon

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

Here’s another installment of “Judge for a day”. The setup, for new readers, is simple. I give you a factual scenario, you tell me what sentence you’d impose as a judge.

The facts are as follows: Defendant is involved in a DUI accident. It is probably his fault. The other car is damaged and the occupants of that car suffer serious injuries, but none that are life threatening or that will result in permanent loss of limbs or functions. The defendant is a young adult with no prior record and good family structure and employment history.

What’s your sentence?

Sphere: Related Content

RSS feed | Trackback URI

7 Comments »

Comment by gerardw Subscribed to comments via email
2008-06-07 17:26:03

Probably his fault? Was there a trial? Was he found guilty?

Assuming yes, 30 days jail time.

Comment by Gideon
2008-06-08 11:13:30

Yes, trial. Yes, his fault.

 
 
Comment by bfrederick Subscribed to comments via email
2008-06-07 18:13:18

Assuming a guilty verdict, 30 days. At least in S.C. on a first offense 30 would be the max, if no loss of limbs, organs, permanent disfigurement, etc. If working, weekend time.

I had one like this last month, where my client was still in the hospital herself over a year later, judge still gave her 30 days. Appealing it now on chain of custody and insufficient notice for TIA.

Comment by Gideon
2008-06-08 11:15:00

Assume: 1) You’re presiding over pre-trial negotiations. What offer would make it acceptable for you.

2) You presided over the trial and defendant was found guilty by the jury.

Take into account the trial tax.

Comment by bfrederick Subscribed to comments via email
2008-06-08 21:03:27

1) I turned down a 440$ fine in the above case and went to trial. .21 BAC but they had problems with their chain of custody with the blood sample.

I would have accepted a dismissal and re-write to reckless driving, 440$ fine. With few exceptions, Judges here will accept whatever we negotiate pre-trial.

2) 30 days.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by John
2008-06-08 06:55:50

30 days??? Wow. If it’s a Connecticut case, after a trial, I’d say 4 years. Maybe 6. With suspended time and probation after. Nobody gets 30 days for anything after a trial.

Comment by Gideon
2008-06-08 11:15:52

Now that’s more like it. This…taste for long sentences in CT puzzles me. See latest post.

 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Subscribe to comments via email
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Readers who viewed this page, also viewed:

Trackback responses to this post


  • link behavior


  • quick comment

    Latest on Tue, 00:31

    Woman in Black: The green thing cracked me up. Thought I got some bad paint fumes.

    Gideon: It is! Only problem is, I seem to have to approve each one

    Marie: I like this "quick comment" thing. It's like a mix of Post-it note, IM & Twitter. Cool!

    prityladybabe: the money being spent to cover the po's gas, hours of doing check-ins that could help county rds , transportation world

    Gideon: Wondering whether to write a new post now or save it for tomorrow

    » Leave a reply



  • syndication

    AddThis Social Bookmark Button
    AddThis Feed Button

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

  • pd blog search

  • terms of use

    Nothing on this blog is legal advice.
    Read the Legal Disclaimer and Privacy Policy.
    For the full comments policy, click here.

    Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License.
  • Polls

    Please select one

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...
  • stats



  • Meta