<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What not to do in Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://apublicdefender.com/2008/04/01/what-not-to-do-in-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2008/04/01/what-not-to-do-in-court/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: SPO</title>
		<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2008/04/01/what-not-to-do-in-court/#comment-20340</link>
		<dc:creator>SPO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 02:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apublicdefender.com/?p=1114#comment-20340</guid>
		<description>What did he have to lose?  This is why attempted murder by life-sentenced criminals ought to be punishable by death, and it demonstrates the fundamental bankruptcy of Woodson v. North Carolina.  These types of crimes should have a guilt determination and then a mandatory death sentence.  

And yes, it would deter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What did he have to lose?  This is why attempted murder by life-sentenced criminals ought to be punishable by death, and it demonstrates the fundamental bankruptcy of Woodson v. North Carolina.  These types of crimes should have a guilt determination and then a mandatory death sentence.  </p>
<p>And yes, it would deter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
