<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: W(h)ither Miranda?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://apublicdefender.com/2008/02/23/whither-miranda/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2008/02/23/whither-miranda/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 01:43:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abiye</title>
		<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2008/02/23/whither-miranda/comment-page-1/#comment-38577</link>
		<dc:creator>Abiye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apublicdefender.com/2008/02/23/whither-miranda/#comment-38577</guid>
		<description>I think it’s better than what we currently have, though. If nothing else, the cops might behave a little better</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it’s better than what we currently have, though. If nothing else, the cops might behave a little better</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gizli kamera</title>
		<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2008/02/23/whither-miranda/comment-page-1/#comment-37666</link>
		<dc:creator>gizli kamera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 08:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apublicdefender.com/2008/02/23/whither-miranda/#comment-37666</guid>
		<description>was particularly interested in that article’s comments as it related to juveniles. In Texas, juveniles in custody have to be magistrated with statutory warnings before giving a written statement and then have to have a magistrate go over the statement with them before signing it. The police get around this by simply interviewing them as a witness in a non-custodial situation, turning them loose and arresting them at a later time</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>was particularly interested in that article’s comments as it related to juveniles. In Texas, juveniles in custody have to be magistrated with statutory warnings before giving a written statement and then have to have a magistrate go over the statement with them before signing it. The police get around this by simply interviewing them as a witness in a non-custodial situation, turning them loose and arresting them at a later time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Güvenlik kameras?</title>
		<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2008/02/23/whither-miranda/comment-page-1/#comment-18852</link>
		<dc:creator>Güvenlik kameras?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apublicdefender.com/2008/02/23/whither-miranda/#comment-18852</guid>
		<description>I think the videotaping works if we move away from a bright-line rule. If there was greater focus on the voluntariness of a confession, then a video from start to finish might better serve the judge in making the determination of whether a confession was voluntary.

Obviously, you are going to have people who feel coerced regardless, but that’s another issue, where perhaps education might come into play.

Of course, you are correct that if there is a coerced confession - the coercion aspect of which is not “caught on tape”, then any challenge to it might be completely useless.

I think it’s better than what we currently have, though. If nothing else, the cops might behave a little better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the videotaping works if we move away from a bright-line rule. If there was greater focus on the voluntariness of a confession, then a video from start to finish might better serve the judge in making the determination of whether a confession was voluntary.</p>
<p>Obviously, you are going to have people who feel coerced regardless, but that’s another issue, where perhaps education might come into play.</p>
<p>Of course, you are correct that if there is a coerced confession &#8211; the coercion aspect of which is not “caught on tape”, then any challenge to it might be completely useless.</p>
<p>I think it’s better than what we currently have, though. If nothing else, the cops might behave a little better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SPO</title>
		<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2008/02/23/whither-miranda/comment-page-1/#comment-16865</link>
		<dc:creator>SPO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 17:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apublicdefender.com/2008/02/23/whither-miranda/#comment-16865</guid>
		<description>Given Miranda&#039;s obvious flaws, as aptly described in SCalia&#039;s dissent in Dickerson, it&#039;s not surprising that people are taking a second look.  Voluntariness gets the short shrift--oh well, be careful what you wish for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given Miranda&#8217;s obvious flaws, as aptly described in SCalia&#8217;s dissent in Dickerson, it&#8217;s not surprising that people are taking a second look.  Voluntariness gets the short shrift&#8211;oh well, be careful what you wish for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TexPD4Parity</title>
		<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2008/02/23/whither-miranda/comment-page-1/#comment-16860</link>
		<dc:creator>TexPD4Parity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 16:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apublicdefender.com/2008/02/23/whither-miranda/#comment-16860</guid>
		<description>I was particularly interested in that article&#039;s comments as it related to juveniles. In Texas, juveniles in custody have to be magistrated with statutory warnings before giving a written statement and then have to have a magistrate go over the statement with them before signing it. The police get around this by simply interviewing them as a witness in a non-custodial situation, turning them loose and arresting them at a later time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was particularly interested in that article&#8217;s comments as it related to juveniles. In Texas, juveniles in custody have to be magistrated with statutory warnings before giving a written statement and then have to have a magistrate go over the statement with them before signing it. The police get around this by simply interviewing them as a witness in a non-custodial situation, turning them loose and arresting them at a later time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gideon</title>
		<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2008/02/23/whither-miranda/comment-page-1/#comment-16859</link>
		<dc:creator>Gideon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 15:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apublicdefender.com/2008/02/23/whither-miranda/#comment-16859</guid>
		<description>I think the videotaping works if we move away from a bright-line rule. If there was greater focus on the voluntariness of a confession, then a video from start to finish might better serve the judge in making the determination of whether a confession was voluntary.

Obviously, you are going to have people who feel coerced regardless, but that&#039;s another issue, where perhaps education might come into play.

Of course, you are correct that if there is a coerced confession - the coercion aspect of which is not &quot;caught on tape&quot;, then any challenge to it might be completely useless.

I think it&#039;s better than what we currently have, though. If nothing else, the cops might behave a little better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the videotaping works if we move away from a bright-line rule. If there was greater focus on the voluntariness of a confession, then a video from start to finish might better serve the judge in making the determination of whether a confession was voluntary.</p>
<p>Obviously, you are going to have people who feel coerced regardless, but that&#8217;s another issue, where perhaps education might come into play.</p>
<p>Of course, you are correct that if there is a coerced confession &#8211; the coercion aspect of which is not &#8220;caught on tape&#8221;, then any challenge to it might be completely useless.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s better than what we currently have, though. If nothing else, the cops might behave a little better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SHG</title>
		<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2008/02/23/whither-miranda/comment-page-1/#comment-16858</link>
		<dc:creator>SHG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 15:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apublicdefender.com/2008/02/23/whither-miranda/#comment-16858</guid>
		<description>Good morning, Gid.  I&#039;m going to deal with the issue of videotaping interrogations some other day, but for the moment, I think it suffers from the same problems Miranda does, except that it will prove far more damning and essentially impossible to overcome.  It&#039;s another good idea that may come back to bite us in the butt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good morning, Gid.  I&#8217;m going to deal with the issue of videotaping interrogations some other day, but for the moment, I think it suffers from the same problems Miranda does, except that it will prove far more damning and essentially impossible to overcome.  It&#8217;s another good idea that may come back to bite us in the butt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: apublicdefender.com @ 2012-05-25 13:08:43 -->
