<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Woman sues drug dealer and wins</title>
	<atom:link href="http://apublicdefender.com/2008/01/08/woman-sues-drug-dealer-and-wins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2008/01/08/woman-sues-drug-dealer-and-wins/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:39:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SPO</title>
		<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2008/01/08/woman-sues-drug-dealer-and-wins/comment-page-1/#comment-12600</link>
		<dc:creator>SPO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 23:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apublicdefender.com/2008/01/08/woman-sues-drug-dealer-and-wins/#comment-12600</guid>
		<description>The equitable doctrine of unclean hands (of which the &quot;parties to an illegal bargain&quot; doctrine is a subset) is broad enough to encompass torts.  The idea is that the courts will simply not sully their hands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The equitable doctrine of unclean hands (of which the &#8220;parties to an illegal bargain&#8221; doctrine is a subset) is broad enough to encompass torts.  The idea is that the courts will simply not sully their hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.cotus</title>
		<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2008/01/08/woman-sues-drug-dealer-and-wins/comment-page-1/#comment-12579</link>
		<dc:creator>S.cotus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apublicdefender.com/2008/01/08/woman-sues-drug-dealer-and-wins/#comment-12579</guid>
		<description>Well, if the drug were legal under some circumstances, they it would be a voidable – not void – contract.

However, this appears to be grounded in tort, and suing someone that did something illegal for you under a tort theory (i.e. negligence) is still available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if the drug were legal under some circumstances, they it would be a voidable – not void – contract.</p>
<p>However, this appears to be grounded in tort, and suing someone that did something illegal for you under a tort theory (i.e. negligence) is still available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SPO</title>
		<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2008/01/08/woman-sues-drug-dealer-and-wins/comment-page-1/#comment-12504</link>
		<dc:creator>SPO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 02:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apublicdefender.com/2008/01/08/woman-sues-drug-dealer-and-wins/#comment-12504</guid>
		<description>Typically, in America, courts leave parties to an illegal bargain where it finds them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typically, in America, courts leave parties to an illegal bargain where it finds them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.458 seconds -->
