Woman sues drug dealer and wins
Here’s a reason for the legalization folks: lawsuits! A woman in Canada successfully sued her drug dealer for giving her bad crystal meth that landed her in a coma.
“It was frustrating not having anything done through the criminal system,” said Sandy Bergen, 23, who has been drug- and alcohol-free since the 2004 incident. “Financially, I’m not really going to gain from it. But it’s a way of holding him responsible.”
Bergen and her parents launched the negligence suit against Clinton Davey in 2005, asking for more than $50,000 in medical costs and other damages. Bergen had a heart attack during the overdose and spent 11 days in a coma.
A Court of Queen’s Bench judge agreed to strike Davey’s statement of defence in the case, which essentially finds him legally responsible.
Get those associates working overtime on this!
| Print article | This entry was posted by Gideon on January 8, 2008 at 9:38 pm, and is filed under whaaaa?. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |
about 2 years ago
Typically, in America, courts leave parties to an illegal bargain where it finds them.
about 2 years ago
Well, if the drug were legal under some circumstances, they it would be a voidable – not void – contract.
However, this appears to be grounded in tort, and suing someone that did something illegal for you under a tort theory (i.e. negligence) is still available.
about 2 years ago
The equitable doctrine of unclean hands (of which the “parties to an illegal bargain” doctrine is a subset) is broad enough to encompass torts. The idea is that the courts will simply not sully their hands.