a public defender


Decision of the day, Texas edition

Posted on January 04, 2008 by Gideon

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

A very faithful reader sent along this humorous decision from the Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District. It’s not from today, or yesterday, but a day almost 4 years ago. Yet, it is funny enough for me to pass along.

Here’s the excerpt from Lexis:

Assistance of court-appointed counsel was not rendered ineffective by the fact that counsel was on the indicting grand jury. Apart from bald assertion of conflict, defendant failed to show how attorney could have represented him more effectively.

As they say, only in Texas. At least it wasn’t a death case.

Sphere: Related Content

RSS feed | Trackback URI

7 Comments »

Comment by SPO
2008-01-05 00:17:01

Other than the optics, what’s the issue here?

 
Comment by Cat
2008-01-05 10:13:00

If you have time…how are grand jurors chosen?

 
Comment by Gideon
2008-01-05 14:09:19

Optics?

 
Comment by Gideon
2008-01-05 14:13:33

Cat:

A grand jury is a group of people that are selected and sworn in by a court, just like jurors that are chosen to serve on a trial jury. In fact, the grand jurors are usually chosen from the same pool of people that provide trial jurors: A judge selects and swears in a grand jury, just like judges select and swear in trial juries.

From Here

 
Comment by EdinTally
2008-01-05 14:16:59

SPO,

The court appointed counsel for the defendant had already served on the grand jury to indict the defendant. Since the atty. was already part of the group that indicted the defendant, it would seem his advocacy for his client would be less than stellar.

 
Comment by SPO
2008-01-07 17:03:37

Edin, I think you’re conflating two issues–one the actual representation given and the alleged conflict. I agree that the optics here (i.e., how this looks) aren’t great, but so what. Just because someone believes that there is probable cause for a trial doesn’t mean that they cannot zealously represent a guy. Hey, how many defense attorneys zealously fight for a guy they know is guilty? Happens all the time–so why is a vote on a grand jury panel any worse than that?

 
Attention: Before you comment, please read the disclaimer/privacy policy and the comment policy. By commenting here, you agree to abide by the terms and conditions of this blog and you take full responsibility for your comments and any consequences thereof.

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Subscribe to comments via email
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Readers who viewed this page, also viewed:

By submitting a comment here you grant this site a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. You have also read and agreed to the disclaimer, privacy policy and comment terms of use, linked to in the sidebar. Comments may be edited and deleted without notice at the will of the owner/author of this blog.

Trackback responses to this post