<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Breathalyzers under fire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://apublicdefender.com/2007/11/27/breathalyzers-under-fire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2007/11/27/breathalyzers-under-fire/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 16:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Breath Alcohol Breathalyzers</title>
		<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2007/11/27/breathalyzers-under-fire/#comment-13405</link>
		<dc:creator>Breath Alcohol Breathalyzers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 02:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apublicdefender.com/2007/11/27/breathalyzers-under-fire/#comment-13405</guid>
		<description>In the UK, breath alcohol testing has been used for over 30 years.  Traditionally, breath testing was conducted at the roadside and was backed up by a secondary urine or blood test, but more recently police stations are equipped with a more accurate breath testing machine which has been standing up in court without issue for several years.

Breath is perfectly valid as a matrix for testing, so their complaint can only be in relation specifically to the equipment itself... but what a can of worms to open - in my opinion, drinking and driving costs lives, so I hope their attempts to undermine the testing process doesn't broadcast the wrong message.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the UK, breath alcohol testing has been used for over 30 years.  Traditionally, breath testing was conducted at the roadside and was backed up by a secondary urine or blood test, but more recently police stations are equipped with a more accurate breath testing machine which has been standing up in court without issue for several years.</p>
<p>Breath is perfectly valid as a matrix for testing, so their complaint can only be in relation specifically to the equipment itself&#8230; but what a can of worms to open - in my opinion, drinking and driving costs lives, so I hope their attempts to undermine the testing process doesn&#8217;t broadcast the wrong message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
