<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Life in the big house</title>
	<atom:link href="http://apublicdefender.com/2007/11/18/life-in-the-big-house/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2007/11/18/life-in-the-big-house/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: AntonK</title>
		<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2007/11/18/life-in-the-big-house/#comment-8611</link>
		<dc:creator>AntonK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apublicdefender.com/2007/11/18/life-in-the-big-house/#comment-8611</guid>
		<description>Actually, I never argued “lock ‘em up and throw away the key” in response to this post. And I only would argue “lock ‘em up and throw away the key” in cases of violent criminals (and I don't know whether Ventura is violent or not).

All I argued in my comment above is that staying out of jail is the best way to avoid the deprivations of jail. Quite simple, actually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I never argued “lock ‘em up and throw away the key” in response to this post. And I only would argue “lock ‘em up and throw away the key” in cases of violent criminals (and I don&#8217;t know whether Ventura is violent or not).</p>
<p>All I argued in my comment above is that staying out of jail is the best way to avoid the deprivations of jail. Quite simple, actually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark from Jersey</title>
		<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2007/11/18/life-in-the-big-house/#comment-8587</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark from Jersey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 02:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apublicdefender.com/2007/11/18/life-in-the-big-house/#comment-8587</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;AntonK&lt;/b&gt; said:

&lt;i&gt;taxpayers&lt;/i&gt; ... &lt;i&gt;to foot the bill&lt;/i&gt;

Your mindset is why the prison system is a failure.  You have the "lock 'em up and throw away the key" mentality.  The person who says all money spent on prisoners is lost.

How do you control inmates in a prison?  Take away all semblance of human dignity, treat them worse than animals, feeding them green bologna and water?  Have them sit around with nothing but anger and resentment 24 hours a day?

The tiny bit of funding it takes to provide a little for prisoners makes sense.  It greatly reduces prison violence, as the prisoners are occupied and content, thus letting the prison staff spend time on "problem" inmates instead of the whole general population.  

With almost all prisoners being returned to society at one point, it makes sense to provide occupational training, treatment for mental and physical problems, and sanitary living conditions.  

Thus, when an inmate returns to society, a job will be easier to secure if he has proper training, is in good health, has a stable mentality, and has a positive outlook on society.  Otherwise you are just dumping him onto the social service/welfare rolls.

He may say "thanks for helping me out when I hit rock bottom" instead of "screw the world, I'm nothing but scum criminal."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>AntonK</b> said:</p>
<p><i>taxpayers</i> &#8230; <i>to foot the bill</i></p>
<p>Your mindset is why the prison system is a failure.  You have the &#8220;lock &#8216;em up and throw away the key&#8221; mentality.  The person who says all money spent on prisoners is lost.</p>
<p>How do you control inmates in a prison?  Take away all semblance of human dignity, treat them worse than animals, feeding them green bologna and water?  Have them sit around with nothing but anger and resentment 24 hours a day?</p>
<p>The tiny bit of funding it takes to provide a little for prisoners makes sense.  It greatly reduces prison violence, as the prisoners are occupied and content, thus letting the prison staff spend time on &#8220;problem&#8221; inmates instead of the whole general population.  </p>
<p>With almost all prisoners being returned to society at one point, it makes sense to provide occupational training, treatment for mental and physical problems, and sanitary living conditions.  </p>
<p>Thus, when an inmate returns to society, a job will be easier to secure if he has proper training, is in good health, has a stable mentality, and has a positive outlook on society.  Otherwise you are just dumping him onto the social service/welfare rolls.</p>
<p>He may say &#8220;thanks for helping me out when I hit rock bottom&#8221; instead of &#8220;screw the world, I&#8217;m nothing but scum criminal.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AntonK</title>
		<link>http://apublicdefender.com/2007/11/18/life-in-the-big-house/#comment-8577</link>
		<dc:creator>AntonK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 21:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apublicdefender.com/2007/11/18/life-in-the-big-house/#comment-8577</guid>
		<description>Perhaps Mr. Ventura would have less to complain about if he could manage to stay out of jail.

Note to Mr. Ventura: visualize a life where the taxpayers of Connecticut are not responsible for repeatedly having to foot the bill for your toiletries and recreational pursuits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps Mr. Ventura would have less to complain about if he could manage to stay out of jail.</p>
<p>Note to Mr. Ventura: visualize a life where the taxpayers of Connecticut are not responsible for repeatedly having to foot the bill for your toiletries and recreational pursuits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
