a public defender


Monday Morning Jumpstart

Posted on October 29, 2007 by Gideon

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

5728124_d0027699fb_o.jpg

Ugh. It’s almost winter. Here are stories to keep you warm on this cold, dark morning:

  • It’s not much, but at least the 18-year old West Hartford kid charged with having sex with his girlfriend is out on bail.
  • CDW’s weekly roundup is here.
  • GA isn’t the only state with capital defense payment problems.
  • Speaking of which, the Brian Nichols trial has turned into quite the spectacle. Now, Judge Fuller is being investigated by the legislature, which seems like an even further colossal waste of time and, more importantly, money.
  • Here’s a really long (and quite strange) semi-biography of Komisarjevsky and Hayes. Curiously, it seems as though someone who wasn’t supposed to speak, did.
  • Who ever thought to challenge fingerprint science? You should have. One judge in Baltimore agrees that it might be junk.
  • Mark Bennett continues to explain himself and his no-snitch stance. Here’s the text from his contract and here he discusses the ethics of snitching.
  • Even better than Jenna! Scott explains “law porn”.
  • The Confrontation Blog has this great post on child witnesses.
  • Norm Pattis offers his take on the latest Skakel development.
  • Blondie gives us another glimpse into the difference between being a pd and working as private counsel.
  • Prof. Berman points out a notable collateral consequence of eliminating parole.

As usual, if you find something worth sharing, leave a link in the comments. Enjoy the day!

Sphere: Related Content

RSS feed | Trackback URI

2 Comments »

Comment by SPO
2007-11-01 07:27:08

Question re: Skakel. How is it that his crime, which was a juvenile case, becomes non-juvenile simply because he got older? I really don’t know what the rules are, but that seems problematic.

 
Comment by Gideon
2007-11-02 09:13:16

[quote comment="7547"]Question re: Skakel. How is it that his crime, which was a juvenile case, becomes non-juvenile simply because he got older? I really don’t know what the rules are, but that seems problematic.[/quote]

That was the big question in his appeal to the state Supreme Court. Read it and perhaps you can explain it to me. I still don’t get it.

Majority
Concurrence

Both are pdf files.

 
Attention: Before you comment, please read the disclaimer/privacy policy and the comment policy. By commenting here, you agree to abide by the terms and conditions of this blog and you take full responsibility for your comments and any consequences thereof.

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Subscribe to comments via email
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Readers who viewed this page, also viewed:

  • N/A

By submitting a comment here you grant this site a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. You have also read and agreed to the disclaimer, privacy policy and comment terms of use, linked to in the sidebar. Comments may be edited and deleted without notice at the will of the owner/author of this blog.

Trackback responses to this post