What should the state’s responsibility be?
Not too much else is happening and I’m still hung up on solving the revolving door of parole, so here’s a poll. What is the solution to this problem and as part of the solution, what do you believe should be the extent of the state’s involvement?
Should the state’s role be limited to incarceration and minimal effort at rehabilitation? Should the state be required to provide enough spots in programs for all inmates? Should the State have to go a step further and ensure that released inmates do not re-offend by providing them employment for a limited period, till they get back on their feet?
Clearly, some people can make it on their own on the outside. Maybe they have been convicted of minor offenses, maybe they have strong family support and jobs waiting for them. A greater number of inmates, however, don’t have a hope. No job, no employable skills, no family and no money. Who, then, should shoulder the responsibility of ensuring that they do not re-offend? It would be in everyone’s interests that they stay on the right side of the law (well, except maybe corrections).
Make your choice (and explain in the comments if you feel like it).
[poll=16]
Image license info here.
| Print article | This entry was posted by Gideon on October 10, 2007 at 7:49 am, and is filed under inmate issues, prison overcrowding, psa. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |


about 4 years ago
The poll isn’t working.
about 4 years ago
Even now?