barfly.jpg

How essential is it to like your client? Is it important, even a consideration? Is it possible to like your clients? Mark Bennett wrote a few days ago about this topic. He noted the differences between civil practice and criminal practice:

Unlike Dan, most criminal lawyers are a) not representing companies; and b) not forming longterm attorney-client relationships. Our clients are people, and if all goes well they will never be in trouble again.

It’s nice to like our clients, but I don’t think it’s crucial. What do you think?

I’d like to point out a further distinction: public defender and private practitioner. The private practitioner can actually choose his clients. He gets to meet with them, listen to their story, decide if he wants to take the case. Involved in that decision is an evaluation of the client’s personality. However minimal the impact a client’s personality has on the decision to represent him, I suspect it plays some role.

We public defenders have no choice. If it’s my arraignment day, you’re my client. I get whatever comes to me in the rotation.

Having said all that, I agree with his conclusion. It would be nice to like the client, but it’s not necessary. Our responsibility is to the client, his liberty and his Constitutional rights. Nowhere does it say that we have to like them. I would be lying, however, if I didn’t say that having a good relationship with a client makes my job easier.

It’s not that I wouldn’t work as hard for a client that yelled at me, called me a “public pretender” or accused me of being in cahoots with the State, it just wouldn’t be as much fun as working with the client that is nice, understanding and appreciative. It is human nature and as much as some don’t want to believe it, we are human too.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print This Post