Comments on: CT SC Excises Portion of Statute to Comply With Apprendi http://apublicdefender.com/2007/09/04/ct-sc-excises-portion-of-statute-to-comply-with-apprendi/ Wed, 25 Apr 2012 01:43:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Criminal Court Record http://apublicdefender.com/2007/09/04/ct-sc-excises-portion-of-statute-to-comply-with-apprendi/comment-page-1/#comment-17807 Criminal Court Record Thu, 06 Mar 2008 02:32:21 +0000 http://apublicdefender.com/2007/09/04/ct-sc-excises-portion-of-statute-to-comply-with-apprendi/#comment-17807 <strong>Bay County Public Criminal Records For Resident Research...</strong> The price of information has gone into a steady increase. Perhaps it has much to do with the rise of Internet use.... Bay County Public Criminal Records For Resident Research…

The price of information has gone into a steady increase. Perhaps it has much to do with the rise of Internet use….

]]> By: Lawmakers try to outdo each other with ridiculous proposals http://apublicdefender.com/2007/09/04/ct-sc-excises-portion-of-statute-to-comply-with-apprendi/comment-page-1/#comment-5188 Lawmakers try to outdo each other with ridiculous proposals Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:26:13 +0000 http://apublicdefender.com/2007/09/04/ct-sc-excises-portion-of-statute-to-comply-with-apprendi/#comment-5188 <p>[...] work. They also want to shore up the “persistent offender” statute, part of which was struck down this [...]</p> [...] work. They also want to shore up the “persistent offender” statute, part of which was struck down this [...]

]]> By: Mark from Jersey http://apublicdefender.com/2007/09/04/ct-sc-excises-portion-of-statute-to-comply-with-apprendi/comment-page-1/#comment-5043 Mark from Jersey Wed, 05 Sep 2007 14:47:21 +0000 http://apublicdefender.com/2007/09/04/ct-sc-excises-portion-of-statute-to-comply-with-apprendi/#comment-5043 Strange ruling in that the Conn. Supreme Court remands the case back for determination of the sentencing factors to the jury. In such a case, will the prosecution have to assemble a new jury, or recall the old jury? Or will the prosecution just offer the defendant a slightly lower prison term? Strange ruling in that the Conn. Supreme Court remands the case back for determination of the sentencing factors to the jury.

In such a case, will the prosecution have to assemble a new jury, or recall the old jury?

Or will the prosecution just offer the defendant a slightly lower prison term?

]]> By: Gideon http://apublicdefender.com/2007/09/04/ct-sc-excises-portion-of-statute-to-comply-with-apprendi/comment-page-1/#comment-4983 Gideon Tue, 04 Sep 2007 21:01:16 +0000 http://apublicdefender.com/2007/09/04/ct-sc-excises-portion-of-statute-to-comply-with-apprendi/#comment-4983 Nice! Just saw this. I'll have to read the decision in detail now. Nice! Just saw this. I’ll have to read the decision in detail now.

]]>