Troubled juvenile prison may stay open
Two years ago, Connecticut’s youth prison was in a boatload of trouble. It was on the verge of closing, promised new Gov. Rell. Ah, not so fast. With CT’s new juvenile jurisdiction law set to go into effect in 2010, the prison may very well get a reprieve.
The $57 million facility, which houses all but the state’s most serious juvenile offenders, is gearing up for a likely increase of its population, and an infusion of about $40 million a year.
Some say that the youth prison’s possible revival has been the result not only of the new law, but also of the power of the unions that represent the 300 employees who staff the place. Others cite a lack of resolve among politicians to shut down a boondoggle, while some point to fiscal and political realities, saying it would cost much more to close the prison and start again elsewhere.
That’s all well and good if the prison is in the same state it was in two years ago. Click on that first link above to be directed to studies about the prison and the awful conditions it existed in. However, things seem to have changed.
The building where the teenage offenders with the worst behavior problems had been housed in drab rooms, with slits for windows, has been converted into a youth center complete with arcade games and an art therapy room. Cinderblock cells once likened to “tiger cages” by Donald E. Williams Jr., a Democrat from Brooklyn, Conn., who is president pro tempore of the Senate, now have better shelving, desks, bulletin boards and carpet.
“It used to be a hellhole,” said Fred Phillips, a longtime youth services officer at the prison. What is there today, he said, “is a great improvement.”
Jeanne M. Milstein, the child advocate, said the prison, which opened six years ago, has improved enough that in April she agreed to shift the monitor she had installed there for the previous two years to a psychiatric hospital for children nearby.
Better, but still not optimal. After all, these are still kids. There’s still a chance with some of them. Studies have shown that kids that are incarcerated in adult prisons or adult-like prisons have a greater rate of incarceration as adults. We need to rehabilitate and re-integrate. Prisons are useless for that.
Jeanne Milstein still favors closing the Middletown prison and opening smaller institutions for young offenders scattered around the state, so they can stay connected to their communities.
But, she said, “I don’t think there’s the political will right now by the legislature to close it.”
I agree. It’s disappointing, but one step at a time.
For more coverage of Connecticut’s trouble with juveniles and juvenile-related posts and legislation, see these previous posts:
- Some say Gov. Rell’s budget shortchanges juvenile system
- Connecticut’s juvenile problem
- State to close boys’ prison (same as first link above)
| Print article | This entry was posted by Gideon on July 31, 2007 at 8:50 pm, and is filed under ct legal news, juveniles, proposed legislation. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |


about 4 years ago
HI Gideon,
I absolutely agree with you when you say that kids are not supposed to be incarcerated in the adults’ prison. Prisons are not for kids at all – they need to be rehabilitated and re-integrated.
I believe among all the factors that impel the kids to become criminal at such an early stage, the increasing rate of divorce cases in the entire the US is also responsible.
Divorces have devastating effects on kids. Constant bickering among parents have extremely negative impact the psyche of the kids and they tend to develop psychological disorder over the times. Studies show more than 33% of juvenile criminals have an unhealthy familial history.
Since divorces are a reality that we have come to terms with now, why not do them in a manner that they do not affect our kids future?
I recently read that BAFL in California is doing a stupendous job by helping many families sort out their marital discord, and suggesting them to take moral responsibility and be there for their kids even after their divorce. After all, the kids are innocent and need to be taken care of properly till they grow adult.