a public defender


Two new blawgs and the Funniest Law Blog Contest

Posted on June 19, 2007 by Gideon

The nomination period for the Funniest Law Blog contest has ended and the 10 finalists have been announced! Head on over to Legal Antics to view the finalists and cast your vote.

It’s time to vote for the funniest law blog. The top 10 blogs submitted are listed in the poll below. Voting will close at 10 pm on June 25th.And guess what? The winner gets a prize! The Billable Hour, which provides clever gifts and greeting cards for legal professionals, is sponsoring this contest. The prize will be the winner’s choice of any single item sold by The Billable Hour (luxury watch line and sets excluded).

Please, only one vote per person. (It appears that a number of you are voting far more than one time for a certain blog. And, those of you doing so are quite proud of that fact and have advertised your minor league “voter fraud” elsewhere. This will not be a repeat of the 2004 presidential elections. I may very well choose to reduce the votes of a certain blog if those of you voting can’t adhere to the simple rule of one vote per person–not per computer–not per scrambled IP address–not per anonymous identity. One.Vote.Per.Person. ‘Nuff said.)

Also, I have added two news blogs to the blogroll:

Both are criminal law related blogs, so be sure to check them out.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

RSS feed | Trackback URI

Comments »

No comments yet.

Attention: Before you comment, please read the disclaimer/privacy policy and the comment policy. By commenting here, you agree to abide by the terms and conditions of this blog and you take full responsibility for your comments and any consequences thereof.

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Subscribe to comments via email
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post