Remember when, a few months ago, M.A.D.D. was at the state Capitol, drinking it up with state troopers to illustrate the dangers of drunk driving and pushing for stronger penalties? Amy D’Aniello was there, supporting M.A.D.D., taking breathalyzer tests, puffing into car ignition locks.

Guess where she was last night at 2:30am? Going 75 in a 45. Anyone want to guess what happened next?

Yep. DUI.

Note how M.A.D.D. immediately implements the “drinking problem” excuse:

“Our wish is that she seek some sort of rehabilitation, if she has a drinking problem” and the she obey the letter of the law, Margolis said.

Under a typical drunk driving arrest, D’Aniello would lose her driver’s license for 90 days, would have to attend pretrial alcohol education classes, complete a year of probation and attend a MADD impact panel, Margolis said.

The Courant news story doesn’t reveal what her BA level was; only that it was above .08.

I understand the driving force behind M.A.D.D. and at some level, I agree. People do need to be careful and not drive drunk. However, it is very easy to be over the legal limit, as Ms. D’Aniello probably discovered yesterday.

Maybe this gets them to rethink their hard-line stance for strict penalties just a little bit. Everything in moderation, be it drinking or sentences.

(with apologies to Stanley Kramer)

Related Posts with Thumbnails