a public defender


Maine to review scores of sex offender bills

Posted on April 18, 2007 by Gideon

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

Maine legislators will begin to review several sex offender bills, including the constitutionality of residency restrictions, when session begins next week. Among the highlights:

  • New crime of loitering in a child safe zone
  • Tiered risk assessment
  • Constitutionality of residency restrictions

Glad to see that more legislatures are beginning to pick up on the fact that these measures don’t really do anything.

Update: While I’m on the subject, here’s another opinion piece coming out against residency restrictions (thanks to Ilah).

No research has evaluated the impact of residency restrictions on recidivism. An Arizona study found child molesters were more likely than rapists to live near schools. The Arizona study did not explore recidivism, however, or other factors affecting sex offenders’ housing choices. No link between residency restrictions and sexual recidivism has been established. Colorado and Minnesota studied this issue prior to enacting residency restriction laws. Researchers found that such laws were not a strategy for preventing sex crimes but found individualized restrictions may be appropriate.

No viable research examines the efficacy of residence restrictions. Research does identify unintended consequences. According to a Florida study involving sex offenders on probation, one quarter reported relocating because of the state’s law. Nearly half reported they could not reside with family. Fifty-seven percent reported less available affordable housing, leading to isolation and stress.

In conclusion he writes:

Residency restrictions disrupt offender stability and often isolate sex offenders from their support systems. While isolation from family is often initially appropriate for family safety, this should be based on risk assessments rather than all encompassing laws. Residency restrictions remove offenders from employment and public transportation, creating financial stress, a dynamic risk factor associated with reoffense. Stable employment and housing are essential for offenders to successfully transition into the community.

Technorati Tags: ,

Sphere: Related Content

RSS feed | Trackback URI

1 Comment »

Comment by Ilah
2007-04-18 20:36:20

Maine’s position in the spectrum of community notification debates is unique. At a time when legislators across the country were enacting laws to broaden and tighten their systems last year, two Maine registrants were murdered by a vigilante–and the murderer had almost three dozen other names on his list. Both of his victims would have been low-risk (one hadn’t offended in more than two decades, the other had been convicted as a teenager of having, well, teen sex.)

It’ll certainly be interesting to see what comes of their debate and study.

 
Attention: Before you comment, please read the disclaimer/privacy policy and the comment policy. By commenting here, you agree to abide by the terms and conditions of this blog and you take full responsibility for your comments and any consequences thereof.

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Subscribe to comments via email
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Readers who viewed this page, also viewed:

Trackback responses to this post