a public defender


Studies on efficacy of registries and residency restrictions

Posted on April 15, 2007 by Gideon

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

Update: Reader “Ilah” has sent quite a few more my way.

Original post: Helpful reader “Oneandonly” points to two studies that conclude that residency restrictions have no impact on sex offenses. Unfortunately, neither one has a date on it, so I’m not sure how recent they are (In fact, the first one is available only via Google’s cache). Does anyone know of any other studies that are being conducted or have been conducted on the effectiveness of residency restrictions and sex offender registries?

This, I think, is a vital point in the discourse over the need for such measures. If they are found to be beneficial, then the argument against them loses some ground, but if they are found to make no difference or even worsen the situation, then obviously there needs to be a stronger push against them.

If you know of any such studies, leave a comment or send me an e-mail.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Sphere: Related Content

RSS feed | Trackback URI

7 Comments »

Comment by Ilah
2007-04-15 13:57:32

IIRC, the two studies cited were performed around 2004, but I’d have to look it up to be certain. There was another study out of Arkansas–deeply flawed–that often gets cited in favor of restrictions. But the Arkansas study found no connection between offenses committed and registrants’ homes. They basically concluded that since registrants lived within a certain radius of schools and such, it must be because children were present. The study made no effort to control for available housing and the like.

The most recent examination of Megan’s Law was done by the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, out of the UK. The pdf is here:
Click here [.pdf] (Edited by admin for better appearance.)

It addresses the utter lack of US research on the matter of effectiveness, and cites research suggesting the current laws actually deter reporting.

There are a few pieces of research out there, most from before 2005, on the effectiveness of community notification. I’ll see what I can pull from my files later today.

 
Comment by Gideon
2007-04-15 14:09:25

The non-wrapping of URLs in the comments is bugging me. I’ll have to find a fix for it. In the meantime, I’m going to edit that, if you don’t mind, so it doesn’t run off into the sidebar like that.

As to your comment, I think the lack of readily available studies on this crucial matter is very telling. There is no scientific basis (as of yet) for this push in favor of residency restrictions. For all we know, they may be utterly useless or counter-productive. I think some defense organization needs to commission a study on this immediately, before it is too late.

 
Comment by Ilah
2007-04-15 21:08:55

Thanks for the edit. I haven’t a clue how to make the links shorter!

I have more links. Would you rather I email them to you?

 
Comment by Gideon
2007-04-15 21:12:25

If you’d like, sure! Alternatively, I think you can use HTML in the comments.

So the tag would be:

< a href="http://www.google.com" >Google< /a > (without the spaces before and after the < and >

and that would produce:

Google

 
Comment by Ilah
2007-04-15 21:17:07

I’ll email ‘em. Considering my level of competence with html matters, it’s probably the safer choice. But…I must be missing it, but can’t find your email on the blog!

 
Comment by Gideon
2007-04-15 21:18:35

You know what, you’re absolutely right! I don’t have my e-mail address anywhere! No wonder I haven’t received any spam e-mails lately.

threegenerations at gmail dot com

 
Comment by Ilah
2007-04-16 01:51:26

Another interesting piece of information:

Megan’s Law Research

Quote: “This is an ongoing initiative scheduled to last 18 months (3 phases). This project will culminate into the first study of its kind in the USA to assess the empirical efficacy of New Jersey’s Megan’s Law.”

According to the blurb, they’ll be examining arrest records before and after the law’s enactment. Good to see someone is going to look at the numbers but, as the UK study pointed out, it’s almost impossible to isolate the effects of Megan’s Law on recidivism.

(I hope I did the link correctly…)

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Subscribe to comments via email
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Readers who viewed this page, also viewed:

Trackback responses to this post


  • link behavior


  • quick comment

    Latest on Tue, 00:31

    Woman in Black: The green thing cracked me up. Thought I got some bad paint fumes.

    Gideon: It is! Only problem is, I seem to have to approve each one

    Marie: I like this "quick comment" thing. It's like a mix of Post-it note, IM & Twitter. Cool!

    prityladybabe: the money being spent to cover the po's gas, hours of doing check-ins that could help county rds , transportation world

    Gideon: Wondering whether to write a new post now or save it for tomorrow

    » Leave a reply



  • syndication

    AddThis Social Bookmark Button
    AddThis Feed Button

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

  • pd blog search

  • terms of use

    Nothing on this blog is legal advice.
    Read the Legal Disclaimer and Privacy Policy.
    For the full comments policy, click here.

    Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License.
  • Polls

    Please select one

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...
  • stats



  • Meta